To British Prime Minister

Weekday edition, June 24, 2025
The BBC described the response to the "illegal immigration protests" in Los An-geles as "the political battle Trump has been waiting for." I think what Trump is doing is right, but it's too late.
Trump should take measures against illegal immigration by accepting "illegal immigrants" in my proposed "special zone." Now that "BRICS" is on the rise, I think illegal immigrants are a "treasure."
During last year's presidential election campaign, US President Trump promised that he would not tolerate lawlessness by the left in the country and would use all of his presidential powers to deal with it. Trump should prioritize "MAGA."
For Trump, the protests against the efforts of Immigration and Customs En-forcement (ICE) in California were an opportunity to put his promise into action. This is a good thing, but it's too late.
Illegal immigrants should be "arrested" and "deported," and I think Trump's re-sponse is excellent. However, President Trump should "revise" his "illegal immi-gration" policy.
On the 12th, in Los Angeles, California, demonstrations protesting President Trump's strengthening of immigration crackdown spread to at least 21 cities across the United States. This trend will not change. President Trump should "accept" this trend.
I believe that if we expel "illegal immigrants", the American economy will also collapse. You can see this by looking at California.
Los Angeles has a population of about 3.9 million, making it the second most populous city in the United States after New York City. According to the latest census, there are about 1.8 million Hispanic residents, accounting for 46% of the total population.
California's GDP will surpass Japan's in dollar terms in 2024, making it the fourth largest economic power (state) in the world. That is why I "continue to propose" the creation of a "special zone on the Mexican border".
Illegal immigrants will only be accepted in "special zones on the Mexican bor-der" such as Texas. They will be given "fixed immigrant" residence status and they can only reside within the "special zone".
If this policy is implemented, all of America's "problems" will be solved. The "Special Zone on the Mexican Border" will become an "industrial zone" where the world's "lowest-wage workers" live.
With the background of "low-wage location and largest consumer market," fac-tories from not only the United States but also the world will move into the "Special Zone." This is "MAGA."
"Temporary immigrants" in the "Special Zone" will be provided with "food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education" free of charge. "Illegal immi-grants" already in various parts of the United States will voluntarily move to the "Special Zone."
"Illegal immigrants" are likely to become a "battle for immigrants" with Califor-nia. I think that for President Trump, the "Special Zone" will be the "biggest pol-icy in the history of the United States."
Part 1 References
[Commentary] The political battle Trump was waiting for: Intervention in the Los Angeles protests
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c628vwq9z9zoI'll write again.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp