2025-4-11: Weekday edition,
"SOS"!! "Facebook" and "X" continue to "block posts" and "suppress speech". Pres-ident Trump should "eliminate" the "suppression of speech" with an "executive or-der" as soon as possible.
On social media, Musk supports the hard-line right wing in various countries, includ-ing the UK, and calls for the overthrow of the government. However, "Democratic Party staff at X" are blocking posts by "Trump supporters".
"Democratic Party staff at X" have blocked my "login" to "X" without "specifying the violation" and are treating "Trump supporters" as "spreaders of false information". It seems that I am not the only victim.
"FB" and "X" have "vaguely" stated that they violated the rules. They have not dis-closed the specific "violation" or "relationship to the rules". If they say it is a viola-tion of the rules, they should specifically state the "violation" part of the "posting document". And the specific violation of the rules should be verified by a public in-stitution.
Germany has a network enforcement act that requires companies to remove false information. However, it is not permitted to unilaterally make information (posted content) false.
If it is false, the false content of the posted document should be specifically indicat-ed. A public review body should be established and judged by that review body. Penalties should be imposed not only on organizations but also on employees of companies.
During the Biden presidency, Facebook and X employees "arbitrarily restricted posts." If I posted "one or two," I was "blocked" without reason.
During the Biden presidency, there was "no freedom of speech." Statements de-fending Russia were not allowed. Posts criticizing the Biden administration were al-so "blocked."
I don't think it was the "top management"'s decision to block these posts. It was "oppression of speech" by "employees who support the Democratic Party."
At "X," Musk noticed the "employee's misconduct" and temporarily lifted the "post-ing restrictions." When Biden "lost the election," Facebook stopped "blocking" for fear of retaliation from Trump.
The EU also has a Digital Services Act (DSA) that requires major IT companies to prevent the spread of false information. The pretext of false information is being misused. Facebook and X are blocking posts by Trump supporters on the grounds of preventing the spread of false information.
However, the definition of false information is "arbitrary". During the Biden admin-istration, the administration itself spread false information. Anything that differed from the Biden administration's message was called false information.
In the "Capitol attack", President Trump was made a "criminal" by the "false infor-mation" spread by the "Biden administration". In the "Trump assassination case", the investigation into the "real culprit" who ordered the "shooter" is "in the dark". Trump should punish the "real criminal" of "false information".
I have made a "realistic proposal" to accept "illegal immigrants" in the "special zone". Even this is "criticized". President Trump's "MAGA" is "patriotism" itself. Go President Trump and Mr. Musk!
Part 1 Citations and References
[SNS and Overseas Elections] <2> "Interference" even under EU regulations
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/shimen/20250327-OYT9T50033/
I'll write again tomorrow
❤Due to Facebook restrictions, we are unable to post details of the "post content."
Click on "Yasuhiro Nagano's ID" on Facebook, then click on the "toworldmedia URL" in the self-introduction section to view.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
