拝啓　リシ・スナク首相　エマニュエル・マクロン 大統領　オラフ・ショルツ首相　

To British Prime Minister


2025-03-06: Weekday edition,
"Special Zones" are a great "business model" that allows "developed countries" to "prosper" without war. I have proposed the "Algerian Special Zone", "Mexican Bor-der Special Zone", and "Philippine Special Zone" as major special zones to the world.

I argue that "refugees and illegal immigrants" should not be accepted in the "home countries" of "developed countries". This is "what everyone is saying". I believe they should be accepted in "overseas special zones".

In Europe, "countries that do not accept immigrants" should "jointly" build an "Alge-rian Special Zone". "Illegal immigrants and refugees" aiming for "Europe" should be accepted in the "special zone" as "temporary immigrants" and employed as "low-wage workers".

Have the "far-right" parties made a breakthrough? A big breakthrough! In Germany, amid growing concerns about the worsening security situation, political parties have put forward strict refugee and immigration policies ahead of the February 23 general election for the Bundestag (lower house), and far-right parties are expected to make a breakthrough. (February 17)

This incident is the responsibility of the "German government that accepted immi-grants." On February 13, a car crashed into a labor union demonstration in Munich, southern Germany, killing a mother and child and injuring about 40 people. Local police arrested the Afghan man (24) who was driving.

The German people should refuse to accept "immigrants and refugees." Political parties in Germany that accept "immigrants and refugees" should be dissolved. Ac-cording to the German news agency DPA, the man's refugee application was reject-ed, but his deportation was postponed due to his young age, etc.

"European" governments say they cannot employ "low-wage workers" unless they accept "refugees and illegal immigrants." The government does not accept the people's "anti-immigration" sentiment. The government "does not listen to my pro-posals." Such parties should be dissolved.

In the "home countries" such as Germany and France, "high value-added parts and materials are produced. Assembly and other processes are carried out by tempo-rary immigrants in the "Algerian Special Zone". In other words, division of labor is necessary.

In the "Algerian Special Zone", "low-wage" workers are employed with "latest equipment", so production can be cheaper than Chinese products. Ultimately, a system will be established that can beat Chinese products at the product level.

Products are exported from the "Algerian Special Zone" to "China, Japan, the United States, etc." In "China and the United States," "products cheaper than Chinese products" become popular.

If product exports from the "Algerian Special Zone" increase, "parts and materials from Europe" exported to the "Algerian Special Zone" through the supply chain will increase. Europe will prosper.

"Europeans" do not coexist with "temporary immigrants". "However", European countries indirectly "employ" "illegal immigrants and refugees". Isn't that wonder-ful?

European citizens should appeal to their governments to create an "Algerian special zone." Companies should also appeal to create an "Algerian special zone." Compa-nies will finally be able to "make a profit."

"Illegal immigrants and refugees" have "low wages." "Food, clothing, shelter, medi-cal care, and education" are free. This is because the "cooperative" that runs the special zone covers these costs. For details, see "Past Posts and Articles."

Part 1 Citations and References
A series of violent crimes committed by refugees in Germany. Will the "far right" make a breakthrough in the general election?
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250217/k00/00m/030/120000c

I will write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

【関連する記事】

• To the British Prime Minister I think..
• 英国首相 へ ライブ中継や動画で会談を見たウクライナ国民は、トラン..
• To the British Prime Minister I suppo..
• 英国首相 へ 私は「トランプ大統領」の25%関税を支持します。決し..
• To the British Prime Minister Apple s..

英国首相 へ


2025-03-06: 平日版、
「特別地帯」は「先進国」が戦争をせずに「繁栄」できる素晴らしい「ビジネスモデル」です。私はこれまで「アルジェリアの特別地帯」「メキシコ国境の特別地帯」「フィリピンの特別地帯」を主要な特区として世界に提案してきました。

私は「難民や不法移民」を「先進国」の「母国」で受け入れるべきではないと主張します。これは「みんなが言っていること」です。私は「海外の特別地帯」で受け入れるべきだとしています。

ヨーロッパでは「移民を受け入れない国」が「共同で」「アルジェリアの特別地帯」を建設すべきです。「ヨーロッパ」を目指す「不法移民や難民」を「特別地帯」で「暫定移民」の身分で受け入れ、「低賃金労働者」として雇用すべきです。

「極右」政党は躍進したか？大躍進だ！ ドイツでは、治安悪化の懸念が高まる中、2月23日の連邦議会（下院）総選挙を前に各政党が厳しい難民・移民政策を打ち出しており、極右政党の躍進が期待されている。（2月17日）

この事件は「移民を受け入れたドイツ政府」の責任だ。2月13日、ドイツ南部ミュンヘンで労働組合のデモに車が突っ込み、母子1人が死亡、約40人が負傷した。地元警察は運転していたアフガニスタン人男性（24）を逮捕した。

ドイツ国民は「移民・難民」の受け入れを拒否すべきだ。ドイツで「移民・難民」を受け入れる政党は解散すべきだ。ドイツの通信社DPAによると、この男性の難民申請は却下されたが、年齢が若いなどの理由で強制送還は延期されたという。

「ヨーロッパ」の政府は、「難民や不法移民」を受け入れない限り「低賃金労働者」を雇用できないとしている。政府は国民の「移民反対」を受け入れていない。政府は「私の提案に耳を傾けない」。このような政党は解散すべきだ。

ドイツやフランスなどの「本国」では「付加価値の高い部品や素材を生産。組み立てなどの工程は「アルジェリアの特別地帯」の暫定移民が行う。つまり分業化が必要だ。

「アルジェリアの特別地帯」では「低賃金」の労働者を「最新設備」で雇用するため、中国製品よりも安く生産できる。最終的には製品レベルで中国製品に勝てる体制が整う。

「アルジェリアの特別地帯」から「中国、日本、米国など」に製品が輸出される。「中国や米国」では「中国製品よりも安い製品」が人気になる。

「アルジェリアの特別地帯」からの製品輸出が増えれば、サプライチェーンを通じて「アルジェリアの特別地帯」に輸出される「欧州からの部品や素材」が増える。欧州は繁栄する。

「欧州人」は「暫定移民」と共存しない。「しかし」、欧州諸国は間接的に「不法移民・難民」を「雇用」する。素晴らしいことではないか。

欧州市民は政府に「アルジェリアの特別地帯」を作るよう訴えるべき。企業も「アルジェリアの特別地帯」を作るよう訴えるべき。企業はようやく「儲かる」。

「不法移民・難民」は「低賃金」。「衣食住・医療・教育費」は無料。特区を運営する「協同組合」がこれらの費用を負担しているからだ。詳しくは「過去」の「投稿、記事」を参照。

第1部 引用・参考文献
ドイツで難民による凶悪事件相次ぐ　総選挙では「極右」が躍進か
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250217/k00/00m/030/120000c

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

To British Prime Minister


2025-03-05: Weekday edition,
The "Philippine Special Zone" will be the "front line" for Western companies to ex-port to the Chinese market. Western governments should support "my plan" to re-locate "Palestinians in Gaza" to the Philippines.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu praised President Trump's Gaza relocation plan. "This is not ethnic cleansing" and "the only viable plan." I think so, but the destina-tion is "NG."

Prime Minister Netanyahu praised President Trump's plan as a "bold new plan" and said, "If the people (of Gaza) want to relocate voluntarily, they should be given the option." I think they should relocate voluntarily.

I think President Trump's "Riviera Plan" is based on the premise that the United States will take possession of Gaza. This is impossible. Gaza is a "Palestinian-controlled area." Trump's Riviera Plan should be "withdrawn."

President Trump's proposal is a "forced relocation proposal." If the relocation is voluntary, Trump should also make a "correction" to clear up the "misunderstand-ing." Trump should relocate "Palestinian hopefuls" to areas far from Palestine.

I propose the "Mindanao Island" in the Philippines. More than 20% of the island's residents are Muslim. The "Bangsamoro Autonomous Government" will be officially launched in May this year.

I am considering making the areas of Mindanao outside the "Bangsamoro Autono-mous Government" into a "Philippine Special Zone."

There is another reason why I am promoting the "Philippine Special Zone." That is because the integration of Taiwan into China is inevitable. I think the Trump admin-istration is aiming to peacefully integrate Taiwan into China and build a peaceful re-lationship with China.

After Taiwan is integrated into China, I think the "pro-American region" that will re-place Taiwan is the Philippines. I think the United States should involve the UK and use the Philippines as a "nearshoring" for the Chinese market.

China is moving its production bases to Mexico, which is closer to the American market. The Philippines should be a back door to China for Western companies. The US and UK should take advantage of it. That is the "Philippine Special Zone".

The US plans to accept "illegal immigrants" from Latin America heading to the US as "temporary immigrants" in the "special zone on the Mexican border" and employ them as "low-wage workers".

"The US and UK" plan to accept "Palestinians" from the "Gaza Strip" as "temporary immigrants" in the "Philippine Special Zone" and employ them as "low-wage work-ers".

The US and European countries are losing out in the "Chinese market", but con-versely Chinese products are flooding the Western market. The Trump administra-tion will fight back with "tariffs", but essentially they should fight Chinese products with "quality and price".

Part 1 Citations and References
Accept Gaza residents in Japan? Pros and cons of Prime Minister Ishiba's remarks and President Trump's "ownership of Gaza", what exactly are "refugees"?
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/9eea96f00b7e2499a67354ed37507b7162e18c1e
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu: "This is not ethnic cleansing," "It's the only feasi-ble plan"... Trump
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250217-OYT1T50023/

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

英国首相 へ


2025-03-05: 平日版、
「フィリピンの特別地帯」は欧米企業が中国市場に輸出する「最前線」になる。欧米政府は「ガザのパレスチナ人」をフィリピンに移住させる「私の計画」を支持すべきだ。

イスラエルのネタニヤフ首相はトランプ大統領のガザ住民移住計画を称賛。「これは民族浄化ではない」「唯一の実行可能な計画」。そう思うが、行き先は「NG」。

ネタニヤフ首相はトランプ大統領の計画を「大胆で新しい計画」と称賛し、「（ガザの）人々が自発的に移住したいなら、選択肢を与えるべきだ」と述べた。自発的に移住すればいいと思う。

トランプ大統領の「リビエラ計画」は米国がガザを領有することを前提にしていると思う。これはあり得ない。ガザは「パレスチナ自治区」だ。トランプ氏のリビエラ計画は「撤回」すべきだ。

トランプ大統領の提案は「強制移住提案」だ。移住が自主的なものなら、トランプ氏は「誤解」を解くための「訂正」も行うべきだ。トランプ氏は「パレスチナ希望者」をパレスチナから遠い地域に移住させるべきだ。

私が提案するのはフィリピンの「ミンダナオ島」だ。この島の住民の20％以上がイスラム教徒だ。「バンサモロ自治政府」は今年5月に正式に発足する。

私は「バンサモロ自治政府管轄」以外のミンダナオの地域を「フィリピンの特別地帯」にすることを考えている。

私が「フィリピンの特別地帯」を推進する理由はもうひとつある。それは台湾の中国への統合は避けられないからだ。トランプ政権は台湾を平和的に中国に統合し、中国と平和的な関係を築くことを目指していると思う。

台湾が中国に統合された後、台湾に代わる「親米地域」はフィリピンだと思います。アメリカはイギリスを巻き込んで、フィリピンを中国市場の「ニアショアリング」として利用すべきだと思います。

中国は生産拠点をアメリカ市場に近いメキシコに移しています。フィリピンは西側企業にとって中国への裏口であるべきです。アメリカとイギリスはそれを利用するべきです。それが「フィリピンの特別地帯」です。

アメリカは中南米からアメリカに向かう「不法移民」を「メキシコ国境の特区」で「一時移民」として受け入れ、「低賃金労働者」として雇用する予定です。

「アメリカとイギリス」は「ガザ地区」の「パレスチナ人」を「一時移民」として「フィリピンの特別地帯」で受け入れ、「低賃金労働者」として雇用する予定です。

アメリカやヨーロッパ諸国は「中国市場」で負けているが、逆に中国製品は欧米市場にあふれている。トランプ政権は「関税」で対抗するだろうが、本質的には「品質と価格」で中国製品と戦うべきだ。

第1部 引用・参考文献
日本にガザ住民を受け入れ？石破首相発言とトランプ大統領「ガザ所有」表明で賛否、そもそも「難民」とは？
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/9eea96f00b7e2499a67354ed37507b7162e18c1e
イスラエル・ネタニヤフ首相「これは民族浄化ではない」「実現可能な唯一の計画」…トランプ
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250217-OYT1T50023/

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

To British Prime Minister


2025-03-04: Weekday edition,
President Trump's "Zelensky is a dictator" remarks are "shocking" European coun-tries. Trump has no intention of going along with Europe, which has been brain-washed by Biden. The world seems to be divided into "left" and "right".

In other words, it was the "left" that forced Russia to invade Ukraine. The left is characterized by a group of "revolutionaries" who want to reset the economy with "war".

President Trump clearly "understands" the cause of the "Ukraine War". This war was started by Biden from his "own desires" when he was "Vice President".

Biden is a "war businessman". In order to succeed in business, it was necessary to "incite" and realize the "threat of war". That's why he forced Russia to invade Ukraine.

Biden's "war business" blossomed in the Ukraine war. Weapons and bombs were used up in a "short period". Weapons and weapons were not enough. The defense industry was busy screaming.

Biden has gone too far. He "stirred up the crisis" in Japan too. The Japanese "left" stirred up the "threats" of "Russia, North Korea, and China." Under the Biden ad-ministration, Japan will have to raise taxes to expand its military power.

Gabbard, who was appointed Director of Military National Intelligence in the Trump administration, said, "Looking at the history between Japan and China, there is a possibility of escalation as Japan moves from a 'self-defense posture' to an 'offen-sive posture.'"

"She" has questioned Japan's "strengthening of defense power" in the past, and expressed her opinion on this day as well. Japan is "confronting" "China" over the Senkaku Islands. Her analytical skills are excellent.

The Biden administration's policy was to provoke "Russia and China" like the "Ukraine War" and have them "invade" Japan. This story was also covered by ma-jor media.

It seems that it has been revealed that Japan is trying to start a war with China by having the Chinese military invade the Senkaku Islands like the Ukraine War, under the pretext that "China has invaded."

A Biden administration would say, "Well done, Japan!" Japan would start a war with China under the "Japan-US Security Treaty." The scenario is that the US would support Japan with military aid.

Gabbard is worried about this. She is worried about the security of the US if Japan were to switch from a self-defense posture to an offensive posture. "I" am worried that Japan will go to war with China.

The Japanese Diet is crazy for giving a standing ovation to Zelensky for provoking Russia and starting a war. Gabbard's worries will become reality.

Trump is a "pacifist." He is busy "cleaning up" the mess of the Biden administration. He "should first achieve peace with Russia." Good luck, President Trump.

Part 1 Citations and References
Europe panics after shocking "dictator" remarks, calling for immediate security re-view
https://www.bloomberg.co.jp/news/articles/2025-02-20/SRZQ1MT1UM0W00
US Director of National Intelligence candidate: "If Japan takes an aggressive stance, there is a possibility of escalation"...opinion expressed at Senate hearing
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250131-OYT1T50118/

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp