April 14, 2026
"A former Iranian foreign minister" warned, "If things continue like this, we will lose everything." I believe both countries will lose everything. President Trump should prioritize alleviating the anxieties of the American people over protecting Israel.
Currently, about 70% of Americans feel that the country's situation is deteriorating, and they are particularly dissatisfied with "rising cost of living" due to inflation, "il-legal immigration," and "political division."
The Trump administration's policies are said to have failed to "control inflation," and many citizens are expressing "anxiety about the economy and the future."
President Trump should prioritize measures to address "rising cost of living" due to inflation (the economy). Many Americans do not want war with Iran. The people are shouting "No to war."
The "War in Ukraine" brought inflationary suffering to the United States and the world. Many Americans elected Trump because he opposed war and blamed infla-tion on Biden.
Outraged by rising prices, some Americans are even calling for Trump's resignation. Trump should readily accept my proposal. Americans should persuade him.
I believe Trump should eliminate the trade deficit and revitalize global trade through export promotion policies, not tariff policies, becoming a leader in global trade.
To achieve this, I believe he should use countervailing duties in conjunction with Trump tariffs as an export promotion measure. If countervailing duties are effec-tively implemented, public discontent will begin to subside.
Trump should call on Americans to promote exports. We should all cooperate to boost exports of American products and eliminate the US trade deficit.
President Trump introduced Trump tariffs to eliminate the trade deficit. However, he should honestly apologize for the tariffs that are causing price increases.
President Trump should calculate tariffs for each importer and eliminate tariffs on the portion where exports and imports balance out. This should change the flow.
For example, Walmart should encourage Chinese exporters to export American products such as agricultural goods and branded items instead of importing clothing and other goods from China.
Many companies want to export Chinese products to Walmart. Walmart should pri-oritize selecting companies that agree to import American products from among these.
Chinese companies will not lose money by complying with Walmart's demands. In fact, they will likely increase their profits by importing from Walmart. The Chinese are shrewd businessmen.
When tariffs are lowered through a "balanced countervailing tariff," consumers will shop at Walmart. Other American retailers will then begin exporting American prod-ucts and importing them tariff-free.
If this chain reaction of "balanced countervailing tariffs" continues, American ex-ports will increase, and the trade deficit will decrease. The American people should demand that President Trump replace his "Presidential Advisors." Go America!
Part 1 References
"We'll lose everything if we continue like this," warns former Iranian Foreign Minis-ter: Why he argued "Now is the time to negotiate while we have a chance"
https://x.gd/rHfsB
I'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
