To British Prime Minister

Weekday Edition July 9, 2025
Due to the Trump tariffs, retailers have not only raised the prices of their prod-ucts, but also started cutting staff. Walmart plans to cut about 1,500 staff. What a shame!
Walmart imports "about one-third" of its products. Naturally, they are subject to the "Trump tariffs." It is difficult for exporters to bear the "Trump tariffs" im-posed on low-priced goods.
To prevent this from happening, I propose the creation of "balanced counter-vailing duties." Walmart should employ the personnel to be cut in its "trading company function."
A policy is needed that will make tariffs "effectively zero." Walmart "purchases" "American products" such as "beef, soybeans, etc." and then exports them to "exporters such as China," and the "tariffs" will be zero.
When the "balanced countervailing duties" are applied, exporters such as China will be subject to the "Trump tariffs" on the "amount of exports minus the amount of imports."
Therefore, Walmart should have "exporters in China and other countries" "im-port American products." In Japan, this would be considered "abuse of domi-nant position," but in this case, it would be fine.
If the "export amount" and the "import amount" are the same, the "Trump tar-iff" would be zero. In that case, Walmart would be in the same state as before the "Trump tariff" was applied, and would not need to raise sales prices.
Furthermore, Walmart would not need to "lay off" employees. Employees would work to purchase American products.
And that's not all. Walmart can expect to make profits by purchasing American products and exporting them to Chinese exporters and others. Walmart's per-formance would improve with the "balanced countervailing duties."
Meanwhile, Chinese "exporters" would be able to make profits by selling "Amer-ican products" purchased from Walmart in China, and their performance would also improve.
In this way, the Trump tariffs, when "combined" with the "balanced countervail-ing duties," would not shrink trade, but would eliminate the US trade deficit and further expand world trade.
White House staff should advise President Trump to introduce "balanced coun-tervailing duties." Government officials from each country should also propose this to the president and others.
I gave the example of the sales alliance between Nissan and GM to promote the export of American cars. This also applies to cars from each country.
Not only that, in the case of cars, if foreign car manufacturers relocate their fac-tories to the United States, excessive competition with foreign car manufactur-ers will occur in the United States.
However, by imposing "balanced countervailing duties," exports of American cars will expand and car companies will prosper. Good luck, White House!
Part 1 Reference Materials
US Walmart to cut 1,500 employees
https://diamond.jp/articles/-/365254I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp