To British Prime Minister

October 9, 2025
President Trump's "tariff war with China" will likely never be resolved. The problem is the fact that a significant portion of "US weapons" uses "Chinese-made rare earths."
In the tariff war, China played its strongest card! It froze the supply of "rare earths for US military weapons manufacturing." "Many Americans" "should know this fact." See Chapter 1.
Many US weapons are manufactured using "Chinese-made rare earths." The US military is said to be the strongest in the world, but without Chinese raw mate-rials, it would be the weakest!
During the first Trump administration, Trump called for "China decoupling," but the US had already become complacent with China, making decoupling impos-sible.
I proposed refining "rare earths" within the US. I also proposed establishing a "special zone" on the Mexican border to incorporate "US-made rare earths" into "US products."
The Biden administration also advocated an "anti-China policy." Yet, it promot-ed electric vehicles, which rely on China for their rare metals. This is insane!
During his second term, Trump has worked to eliminate the trade deficit through reciprocal tariff policies, but in negotiations with China, China contin-ues to undermine the United States with its rare metal embargo.
The United States primarily exports rare earth ores to China and imports them in the form of compounds and metals. China accounted for 78% of imports from 2017 to 2020. Does this make sense? This is insane.
Clearly, being able to carry out everything from mining to processing and man-ufacturing domestically in the United States will lead to a stable supply. The Trump administration is also focusing on this point.
Under the Trump administration, the United States has achieved domestic min-ing, processing, and manufacturing. This is very encouraging. Trump should further "support" this with tariff revenues.
Rare metals should be supplied primarily as "military supplies." The United States must not provoke China until it is able to produce rare metals domesti-cally.
Products using lithium batteries are increasing every day. To ensure a stable supply, batteries should be the second highest priority after weapons. Battery storage is essential for a stable supply of renewable energy.
The widespread adoption of AI requires massive amounts of electricity. AI data center operators are building nuclear power plants to generate electricity for their own operations. How wonderful!
If we're promoting EVs, EV manufacturers should produce hydrogen at nuclear power plants and produce "hydrogen-fueled EVs." Are you listening, Elon Musk?
"Anti-China" Americans should create "special zones," employ "illegal immi-grants" as low-wage workers, and produce many products domestically. Any complaints?
Part 1: References
The US and China Play Their Ultimate Trump Card! Rare earth freeze reveals Trump tariff allegations: "Used for US military weapons production"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/6ff98db63d936a763909a7f46cc65d065be9718dI'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp