拝啓　リシ・スナク首相　エマニュエル・マクロン 大統領　オラフ・ショルツ首相　

To British Prime Minister


2025-03-26: Weekday edition,
Many ruling parties in Europe are calling for support for Ukraine. They are calling for war to vent the frustration of their people who are suffering from "economic stag-nation". It is similar to when Hitler in Germany started the "World War II".

World War II began just 20 years after the end of World War I. It began when Ger-many tried to shift the blame for its difficulties onto the Jews and Communists.

The trigger for World War II was Germany's invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939. The Vietnam War began when the Johnson administration "fabricated" the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

This time, the West is blaming Russia for its difficulties. The Pope has said that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a war in which Russia was arbitrarily forced to in-vade Ukraine by a certain country.

On September 20, the year before the war began, Biden conducted a large-scale military exercise with a multinational force consisting of 15 countries, including Ukraine, and on October 23, 180 anti-tank missile systems (Shavelin) were de-ployed in Ukraine.

In response, Russian President Putin deployed about 100,000 Russian troops near the border with Ukraine from the end of October to early November, and made moves to surround Ukraine.

On December 7, Biden forcibly proposed a meeting with President Putin, and after the meeting, he expressed a negative view that he was "not considering" sending US troops to Ukraine to prevent Russian military invasion.

President Trump is working hard to end the Ukrainian war, but after the ceasefire, European countries have stated that they will "gain military hegemony over Ukraine and protect Ukraine." Although Russia has refused, this is an important condition for a ceasefire in Europe.

Europe is preparing for "World War III." Trump has determined that World War III is realistic and is desperately calling for a ceasefire.

American media is censoring Putin's words and actions. They are reporting articles that report information leaked to the West about Russia. See yesterday's article "US envoy visiting Moscow this week asks Putin to accept ceasefire proposal?"

This time, FB is not restricting posts. However, X has made it "impossible" for me to post. X is run by Mr. Musk, but in reality it is run by "employees" of the Demo-cratic Party. This is the reality of America.

Italy, a member of NATO and the EU, refused to send troops to Ukraine. NATO and the EU cannot make resolutions as organizations.

I think Trump will withdraw the US from NATO to avoid involvement. He is smart. He doesn't want to lose assets in a war.

I think this World War III will be a nuclear war between Russia and Europe. I think Trump will position America as neutral.

I think Trump will make money by exporting goods from the US, which is not a bat-tlefield, to "Europe, which is a battlefield," like in World War I and World War II. That way, America can become a "rich country" after the war. This is also MAGA. Good luck, Trump!

Part 1 Citations and References
"World War II" and the Rise of Hitler for 14-year-olds
https://diamond.jp/articles/-/304583

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

【関連する記事】

• 英国首相 へ 今回、西側は困難の原因をロシアに押し付けている。ロー..
• To the British Prime Minister In the ..
• 英国首相 へ 結局、この2人が第三次世界大戦を防ぎ、ウクライナ戦争..
• To the British Prime Minister Putin s..
• 英国首相 へ プーチン大統領は、「我々はまた、30日間の停戦期..

英国首相 へ


2025-03-26: 平日版、
欧州の多くの与党はウクライナ支援を主張している。彼らは「経済停滞」に苦しむ国民の不満をぶちまけるために戦争を求めている。それはドイツのヒトラーが「第二次世界大戦」を始めた時と似ている。

第二次世界大戦は第一次世界大戦の終結からわずか20年後に始まった。ドイツが困難の責任をユダヤ人と共産主義者に転嫁しようとしたことから始まった。

第二次世界大戦のきっかけは1939年9月1日のドイツのポーランド侵攻だった。ベトナム戦争はジョンソン政権がトンキン湾事件を「捏造」したことから始まった。

今回、西側は困難の原因をロシアに押し付けている。ローマ法王は、ロシアのウクライナ侵攻は、ある国によってロシアが恣意的にウクライナ侵攻を強いられた戦争だったと述べている。

開戦前年の9月20日、バイデンはウクライナを含む15カ国からなる多国籍軍と大規模な軍事演習を実施し、10月23日にはウクライナに対戦車ミサイルシステム（シャベリン）180基を配備した。

これに対し、ロシアのプーチン大統領は10月末から11月初旬にかけて、ウクライナとの国境付近に約10万人のロシア軍を配備してウクライナを包囲する動きを見せた。

12月7日、バイデンはプーチン大統領との会談を強引に提案し、会談後にはロシアの軍事侵攻を阻止するために米軍をウクライナに派遣することは「検討していない」と否定的な見解を示した。

トランプ大統領はウクライナ戦争終結に尽力しているが、停戦後、欧州諸国は「ウクライナに対する軍事的覇権を握り、ウクライナを守る」としている。ロシアは拒否しているが、これは欧州の停戦の重要な条件である。

欧州は「第三次世界大戦」に備えている。トランプは第三次世界大戦が現実的と判断し、必死に停戦を呼びかけている。

アメリカのメディアはプーチンの言動を検閲している。西側に漏れたロシアの情報を報じる記事を紹介している。昨日の「今週モスクワを訪問する米特使、プーチンに一時停戦提案受け入れを要請か？」を参照のこと。

今回、FBは投稿を制限していない。しかし、Xは私の投稿を「不可能」にしている。Xはマスク氏が運営しているが、実際は民主党系の「従業員」が運営している。これがアメリカの現実だ。

NATOとEUの加盟国であるイタリアはウクライナへの派兵を拒否した。NATOとEUは組織として決議できない。

トランプ氏　は関与を避けるためにNATOからアメリカを脱退させると思う。彼は賢い。彼は戦争で資産を失いたくないのだ。

この第3次世界大戦はロシアとヨーロッパの核戦争になると思う。トランプはアメリカを中立に位置付けると思う。

トランプは、第一次世界大戦、第二次世界大戦のように、戦場ではないアメリカから「戦場であるヨーロッパ」に商品を輸出して儲けるのではないかと思う。そうすれば、戦後アメリカは「豊かな国」になれる。これもMAGAだ。トランプ、頑張って！

第1部 引用・参考文献
14歳のための「第二次世界大戦」とヒトラーの台頭
https://diamond.jp/articles/-/304583

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

To British Prime Minister


2025-03-25: Weekday edition,
At the end of World War II, the US and Soviet leaders held the "Yalta Conference," and the US and Soviet leaders who ended the Cold War held the "Malta Confer-ence." Would the name of the US-Soviet summit that ended the Ukrainian war and prevented World War III be called the "Riviera Conference"?

In December 2019, 30 years have passed since the Malta Conference. Around this time, the "arrogance of the West" was pointed out. I think the Ukrainian war was also part of that. I had already proposed the "Special Zone Concept." If the special zone had been built, the Ukrainian war would not have happened.

The island of Malta in the Mediterranean Sea. On December 3, 1989, the US and Soviet leaders shook hands here and declared the end of the Cold War. I still re-member the fall of the Berlin Wall. Two years after the Malta Conference, the Sovi-et empire collapsed.

The so-called Western camp, the United States, Europe, and Japan, celebrated the collapse of the Soviet Union as a "victory in the Cold War." They assumed that a democratic liberal order would dominate the world. The United States seemed to have erased the nightmare of the Vietnam War.

However, looking back, the United States, Europe, and Japan were very wrong. The collapse of the Soviet Union did not mean the victory of the Cold War, as the Nikkei newspaper wrote at the time.

On December 3, 1989, when asked by a reporter if the war was over, Gorbachev replied, "I said that the world has left the era of the Cold War and entered a new era."

This answer is known as a declaration of the end of the "Cold War" between the communist countries centered on the Soviet Union and the capitalist countries cen-tered on the United States. Everyone thought so.

The conference was held in the midst of the Eastern European Revolution, when Eastern bloc countries such as Poland were promoting democratization. In Novem-ber, the Berlin Wall, a symbol of the Cold War, also collapsed, and the "Iron Cur-tain" disappeared.

Although the Soviet Union abandoned communist dictatorship, the economic crisis deepened and the demands for independence of the member states of the Soviet Union intensified. The Soviet Union collapsed in December 1991. The United States, confident of the victory of democracy, entered an era of "single-nation dominance."

However, the "war on terror" following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks became protracted, and a feeling of war weariness spread. In 2013, President Obama stated that "the United States is not the world's policeman," and President Trump also acknowledged this.

In 2014, Russia annexed Crimea in southern Ukraine under the dictatorial regime of President Putin. China is expanding its sphere of influence with the "One Belt, One Road" mega-economic zone initiative, challenging the hegemony of the United States.

I argue that Western countries should win the economic war and reclaim the world's factory by building special economic zones on their borders and overseas, accepting illegal immigrants and refugees as "temporary immigrants," and employ-ing them as low-wage workers. War is the "enemy of growth" of developed coun-tries.

The US, Russia and China should form a G3MA (Great Three Military Alliance) and jointly manage world hegemony. If the G3MA is formed, I think there will be no more wars in the world for the next 100 years.

Zelensky and other European leaders are "prepared" for World War III and are pro-voking Russia. Trump and Putin are in agreement about avoiding World War III.

In the end, these two will prevent World War III and end the Ukrainian war. I think holding this conference in "Gaza, Palestine" will be a "symbol of peace." A "confer-ence" in a "place of ruins" will go down in history. Trump will want to call it the Riv-iera Conference.

Part 1 Citations and References
The Malta Conference that declared the end of the Cold War: 30 years later, China and Russia challenge US hegemony
https://www.sankei.com/article/20191201-W27O2FNWOBNYFGGU2UYH7IH7UQ/

I will write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

英国首相 へ


2025-03-25: 平日版、
第二次世界大戦の終わりに米ソ首脳が「ヤルタ会談」、冷戦を終わらせた米ソ首脳が「マルタ会談」を開催した。ウクライナ戦争を終わらせ、第三次世界大戦を防いだ米ソ首脳会談の名称を「リビエラ会談」と呼ぶのだろうか。

2019年12月、マルタ会談から30年が経った。この頃、「西側の傲慢さ」が指摘された。ウクライナ戦争もその一環だったと思う。私はすでに「特区構想」を提案していた。特区が建設されていれば、ウクライナ戦争は起こらなかっただろう。

地中海に浮かぶマルタ島。1989年12月3日、米ソ首脳がここで握手し、冷戦の終結を宣言した。ベルリンの壁崩壊は今でも覚えている。マルタ会議から2年後、ソ連帝国は崩壊した。

いわゆる西側陣営、米国、欧州、日本は、ソ連の崩壊を「冷戦の勝利」と祝った。彼らは、民主主義的自由主義秩序が世界を支配すると想定していた。米国は、ベトナム戦争の悪夢を消し去ったかに見えた。

しかし、振り返ってみると、米国、欧州、日本は大きく間違っていた。ソ連の崩壊は、当時の日経新聞が書いたように、冷戦の勝利を意味しなかった。

1989年12月3日、記者から戦争は終わったのかと問われたゴルバチョフは、「世界は冷戦の時代を脱し、新しい時代に入ったと言った」と答えた。

この答えは、ソ連を中心とする共産主義国と米国を中心とする資本主義国との間の「冷戦」の終結宣言として知られている。誰もがそう思った。

会議は東欧革命のさなか、ポーランドなど東側諸国が民主化を進めていた時期に開催された。11月には冷戦の象徴だったベルリンの壁も崩壊し、「鉄のカーテン」は消滅した。

ソ連は共産主義独裁を放棄したものの、経済危機は深刻化し、ソ連加盟国の独立要求は強まった。ソ連は1991年12月に崩壊。民主主義の勝利を確信した米国は「一国優位」の時代を迎えた。

しかし、2001年9月11日の同時多発テロ以降の「テロとの戦い」は長期化し、厭戦気分が広がった。2013年にはオバマ大統領が「米国は世界の警察官ではない」と発言し、トランプ大統領もこれを認めた。

2014年、ロシアはプーチン大統領の独裁政権下でウクライナ南部のクリミアを併合した。中国は「一帯一路」巨大経済圏構想で勢力圏を拡大し、米国の覇権に挑戦している。

私は、西側諸国は国境や海外に経済特区を建設し、不法移民や難民を「一時的移民」として受け入れ、低賃金労働者として雇用することで経済戦争に勝利し、世界の工場を取り戻すべきだと主張する。戦争は先進国の「成長の敵」である。

米国、ロシア、中国はG3MA（三大軍事同盟）を結成し、共同で世界の覇権を管理するべきだ。G3MAが結成されれば、今後100年間、世界で戦争はなくなると思う。

ゼレンスキー氏ら欧州首脳は、第三次世界大戦を「覚悟」で、ロシアを挑発している。トランプ氏とプーチン氏は第三次世界大戦を回避することで一致している。

結局、この2人が第三次世界大戦を防ぎ、ウクライナ戦争を終わらせるだろう。この会議を「パレスチナ・ガザ」で開催することは「平和の象徴」になると思う。「廃墟の場」での「会議」は歴史に残るだろう。トランプ氏はこれをリビエラ会議と呼びたがるだろう。

第1部 引用・参考文献
冷戦終結を宣言したマルタ会議：30年後、中国とロシアが米国の覇権に挑戦
https://www.sankei.com/article/20191201-W27O2FNWOBNYFGGU2UYH7IH7UQ/

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

To British Prime Minister


2025-03-24: Weekday edition,
On March 13, President Putin presented the United States with a list of demands for a 30-day ceasefire. This ceasefire proposal seems to be "for Ukraine." Everyone is saying so.

President Trump should promise President Putin that he will not use this as a means to "buy time" for "Ukraine" to "restore the situation," as was the case with the Minsk agreements.

In his new remarks on Thursday, President Putin declared that Russian forces are repelling Ukrainian forces on all fronts, especially now in Kursk. This is a preamble. It is to say that the current war situation should be understood.

"Command and control of the Ukrainian army in the invaded areas is no longer pos-sible," Putin said. And he said, "At the first stage, the Ukrainian army tried to with-draw from the area in small groups. This is no longer possible." He said Ukraine is in a situation of unconditional surrender.

The Russian leader is "in favor" of achieving a 30-day ceasefire, but has serious doubts about what conditions should be added. I think this is a "question of com-mon sense".

In short, at this point Putin, through the translations of state media, has conveyed the following "list of objections". See "Part 1" for details.

Putin said: "We also want guarantees that Ukraine will not mobilize, train soldiers, or receive weapons during the 30-day ceasefire period." I believe this is due to the "failure of the Minsk agreements".

Putin warned that the Ukrainian military may use the ceasefire period to reorganize, increase weapons production, and train new soldiers. Can the Trump administration guarantee this to Russia?

Putin asked: "How will you use these 30 days? Will you continue forced mobilization in Ukraine? Will you receive further arms supplies? Will you train newly mobilized forces? Or will nothing happen?"

He further added that it would be difficult to enforce a ceasefire on such a vast bat-tlefield.

Can the US envoy explain this? The Russian answer would be "no". What do you think, readers of this article?

He said that ceasefire violations could easily be contested and lead to accountabil-ity on both sides. A "control and verification" system to monitor the ceasefire has not yet been put in place, but should be agreed upon. I have the same doubt!

Some of these demands have undoubtedly been conveyed to the US side, and Reu-ters reports that the Kremlin has submitted a formal list of demands to achieve a permanent ceasefire. The envoy must have brought the answers back to Russia.

I think Russia will reject this US ceasefire proposal. I think President Trump is in a difficult position between Europe and the US, but as "comrades of superpowers," I think we should agree on a "satisfactory ceasefire."

President Trump, after the Ukraine war agreement, please do your best to "estab-lish G3MA" to achieve permanent peace in the world. Please.

Part 1 Citations and References
US envoy visiting Moscow this week asks Putin to accept temporary ceasefire plan
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/putin-rejects-us-temporary-cease-fire-plan-appears-military-fatigues

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/